| Tera Daisy Spawn / Beth McMillan ( @ 2008-02-24 22:23:00 |
| Entry tags: | politics |
Ugh
Just came across this deeply unpleasant article on the usually reasonable Lifehack. A snippet:
"I’m amused by those who suggest that obesity is primarily an education problem, when in reality, it is (for the majority) a self-control problem. Self control: yes, that crazy, outdated notion I’ve spoken of many times before. We are inundated with education but we choose not to learn. Real ‘learning’ would have resulted in a large-scale positive change in behavior, and of course, decline in obesity levels."
So naturally I replied:
"You seem to be ignoring the fact that the highest levels of obesity occur within the working class, i.e. the area of society with probably the lowest level of education, the highest (and cheapest) availability of junk food and the least time for the middle-class pursuit of self-improvement. If there has been an upswing in obesity, it is because there has been a change in conditions, not because people have suddenly become incredibly lazy. The massive, multi-million-dollar fast food companies advertise to children from the word go - people are innoculated with the idea that there are foods you should eat because they are healthy (but boring) and there are foods you shouldn't eat but should want to eat because they are unhealthy but delicious. The power of advertising must not be underestimated in people's relationship with food. There may be a million reasons why someone might overeat, and refusing to examine them in favour of assigning blame just sidesteps the root of the issue. This narrow view of obesity as an individual problem, rather than a society-wide change allows overweight people to be further stigmatised and the problem to be sidelined into not being the responsibility of anyone but the person in question, allowing wider society, the food giants and the government to turn a blind eye and create a new group of social pariahs."
Anyone else's thoughts?